Comatose Monitoring
OMT
monitoring is appropriate for all coma patients, and is
especially critical for those on a ventilator.
The brainstem is
viewed by all neuroscientists as the main engine of the
health status of the core brain, and yet today there is
no method of directly monitoring its status in a general
way. Current standard of care revolves around the use
of vital signs and multiple indirect tests, including
the Glasgow Coma Score (CGS), the vestibulo-occular
reflex (VOR), pupillary responsiveness, responses to
painful stimuli, and systolic hypotension to name a
few. Glasgow Coma Scoring is the most relied upon, yet
is not dynamic enough to reflect the moment-to-moment
changes of the patient state. Furthermore, it is not
useful after drug induction.
Each of these clinical
measurements reflects the status of only one circuit
within the brain – thus the need for numerous and
diverse tests. They are generally performed once every
30 to 60 minutes by the nursing staff and recorded on
the patient record. When reviewing the charts, the
neuro-clinician must make decisions based upon his or
her understanding of these indirect or secondary
measurements and how they reflect what’s happening in
the patient’s brain. Further, these measurements were
taken at a given point in time, and do not reflect a
continuum of activity. Neuro-clinicians need more
reliable information for decision-making and improved
care, as well as to be better able to communicate the
patient’s status accurately and objectively to the
family.
Studies have shown
that OMT frequency, an objective measure of brainstem
activity, is depressed in the comatose patient and that
it correlates with patient state as currently measured
by pupillary reflexes, Glasgow Coma Scoring, and
brainstem auditory evoked responses (see Appendix B).
Studies have also shown that certain OMT frequency
levels can anticipate favorable or unfavorable outcomes,
which would allow for improved allocation of resources
to patients with a greater chance of recovery
(Appendices B and C).
Through continuous OMT monitoring, caregivers can be
alerted to changes in the patient’s condition, allowing
for more timely and effective adjustments to treatment
strategies. And they can readily determine through
changes in OMT whether or not their treatment choices
are having the desired results. Because of this, we
believe that significant improvement in clinical
pathways will be provided by the introduction of
real-time OMT monitoring, resulting in shortened stays,
saving of lives, and huge economic productivity gains
estimated to be up to $6 billion for this market, or 15%
of current expenditures.